Lawmakers ended up delaying the ethics hearing Thursday and rescheduled it for Valentine's Day Monday. Today, House Chief Clerk Charlie Smithson sent out this message letting us know the meeting won't address the Baudler complaint Monday either. Here's his message:
Due to scheduling logistics for some of the House Ethics Committee members:
1. The meeting on February 14 at noon for the House Ethics Committee will be a discussion on the proposed House Rules Governing Lobbyists ONLY.
2. There will be NO discussion on the Pesce v. Baudler Ethics Complaint. This issue will be the focal point of the next Ethics Committee meeting (not yet scheduled).
Thank you all.
Charlie Smithson
Chief Clerk of the House
3 comments:
Under the Baudler code, an Illinois lawmaker could come poach a deer in Iowa.
Dave we actually have others from the GOP who have came over to ourside over this and wil be at the hearing to question the remaining Baudler brain cells upstairs Clel still has left.
IA Rep. Clel Baudler Responds to Concerned Iowan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sn4TJS27Kf8
GreenCentralStation BRINGS IT!!
Exposing IA Lawmaker in HSB 4 Sub Hearing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbFgXbduhRs
Iowa Clemency Project Files Ethics Complaint Against
Impeach Clel Baudler Iowa -FACEBOOK page
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_179981095377079
PLEASE SHOW YOUR SUPPORT OF CANNABIS LAW REFORM IN IOWA
Clel Baudler is a disgrace to the state of Iowa. I hear so many people try to make this a Dem vs. Repub or anti vs. pro-cannabis. In all truth the ethics in question involve neither. The question is; should we allow our elected representatives to go on law violating vigilante missions? I would hope that all Iowans would answer NO. This is about honesty and integrity, not politics and pot. Iowa should FIRE THE LIAR.
Excellent POLL question for you Price....
should we allow our elected representatives to go on law violating vigilante missions?
Post a Comment